CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Weld Overlay Repair of Tundish Chains in Continuous Casters

Literature Overview

Tundish chains (also referred to as ingot chains or starter bar chains) in continuous casting machines serve as the initial solidification starter for the cast strand. These chains are subjected to extreme operating conditions including contact with molten steel at temperatures exceeding 1500 °C, mechanical loading from strand weight and pulling force, and corrosive attack from molten flux. Wear, corrosion, and deformation of the chain surface and engagement teeth necessitate periodic repair or replacement. Weld overlay repair offers a cost-effective alternative to complete chain replacement, extending service life while minimizing downtime.

Operating Conditions and Failure Modes

Service Environment

Parameter Typical Value Impact on Chain Material
Molten steel temperature 1500–1600 °C Thermal degradation, oxidation
Strand pulling speed 0.5–2.5 m/min Mechanical wear, fatigue
Flux temperature 1300–1400 °C Chemical attack, spalling
Thermal cycling frequency 1 cycle per cast Thermal fatigue cracking
Cast duration 8–12 hours Cumulative damage accumulation

Primary Failure Modes

  1. Surface wear: Gradual material removal from the chain engagement surface due to sliding contact with the starter bar
  2. Thermal erosion: Material loss from the chain surface due to molten steel and flux impingement
  3. Corrosion spalling: Oxidation and subsequent spalling of the surface layer due to thermal cycling
  4. Mechanical deformation: Plastic deformation of chain teeth under high contact stress
  5. Cracking: Thermal fatigue cracks initiating at surface defects or stress concentration sites

Weld Overlay Repair Technology

Material Selection for Overlay

The overlay material must provide a combination of high-temperature strength, oxidation resistance, and wear resistance while maintaining adequate bond strength to the base chain material (typically carbon steel or low-alloy steel).

Overlay Material Hardness (HV) Service Temperature Limit Application Scenario
Cr12MoV (high carbon steel) 500–550 600 °C General wear repair
H13 (hot work die steel) 400–450 600 °C Moderate thermal stress
410H (martensitic SS) 350–400 800 °C Higher temperature service
Stellite 6 (Co-Cr alloy) 400–450 1000 °C Severe wear and corrosion
Ni-based alloy (Inconel 625) 250–300 900 °C Severe corrosion environment

Welding Process Selection

The choice of welding process depends on the chain geometry, repair area size, and available equipment:

Process Deposition Rate Penetration Suitability for Chain Repair
Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) High Deep Large flat surfaces, thick buildup
Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) Medium Moderate Versatile, good for complex geometry
Electroslag Welding (ESW) Very High Very Deep Large areas, thick overlay
Flux-Cored Arc Welding (FCAW) Medium-High Moderate Field repair, good deposition rate
Plasma Transferred Arc (PTA) Medium Shallow Precision repair, low dilution

Repair Procedure and Process Design

Pre-Repair Preparation

  1. Inspection and assessment: Determine the extent of wear, identify cracks (using magnetic particle testing or ultrasonic testing), and measure remaining material thickness
  2. Surface preparation: Remove worn material, oxidation, and flux residue using grinding or cutting; ensure a clean, sound base for overlay
  3. Crack repair: If cracks are present, remove them completely by machining or grinding, and apply a stress-relieving groove preparation
  4. Preheating: Apply uniform preheating at 150–250 °C to reduce thermal stresses and prevent hydrogen-induced cracking

Overlay Application Strategy

The repair overlay is typically applied in multiple passes to achieve the required thickness and ensure proper metallurgical bonding:

Post-Weld Treatment

Treatment Purpose Typical Parameters
Stress relief Reduce residual stresses 550–650 °C, 1–2 hours
Heat treatment (if applicable) Achieve target hardness and toughness Quench and temper per material specification
Surface finishing Remove surface irregularities Grinding to specified surface roughness
Dimensional verification Ensure geometry meets specifications CMM or manual measurement

Quality Control and Inspection

Non-Destructive Testing Requirements

NDT Method Application Acceptance Criteria
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) Surface and near-surface cracks No linear indications in overlay or HAZ
Ultrasonic Testing (UT) Bond strength, internal defects No indications per relevant standard
Visual Testing (VT) Surface quality, geometry No porosity, undercut, or excessive reinforcement

Mechanical Property Verification

Engineering Practice Considerations

Economic Analysis

The economic case for weld overlay repair versus complete chain replacement must consider:

Typically, weld overlay repair costs 30–50% of complete replacement, with the added benefit of potentially restoring the chain to better-than-original condition through the use of superior overlay materials.

Field Implementation Challenges

  1. Access limitations: Chains in service may have limited access for welding equipment and operator positioning
  2. Geometry complexity: Chain teeth and engagement surfaces have complex geometries that may be difficult to weld
  3. Base metal condition: Repeated thermal cycling may have degraded the base metal properties, affecting weldability
  4. Dimensional accuracy: Repair must restore original dimensions to ensure proper engagement with starter bars

Key Technical Insights and Reflections

The most important lesson from studying tundish chain repair is that the overlay repair strategy must be tailored to the specific failure mode rather than applying a generic repair approach. A chain suffering primarily from thermal erosion requires a different overlay material and process than one suffering from mechanical wear. Failure to diagnose the root cause of degradation and select the appropriate repair strategy is the most common cause of premature repair failure.

Another critical insight is the importance of the transition layer in the multi-pass repair strategy. The first pass serves as the metallurgical bridge between the base material and the overlay material, and its quality directly determines the long-term reliability of the repair. In practice, the transition layer composition should be carefully selected to ensure complete fusion with the potentially degraded base metal while providing a suitable substrate for the subsequent overlay passes.

The practical experience also highlights the importance of post-weld stress relief. The thermal stresses induced during the welding repair process can be comparable to those experienced during normal service, and without proper stress relief, these stresses can initiate premature cracking during subsequent thermal cycling. The stress relief treatment parameters must be carefully controlled to avoid softening the overlay layer while effectively relieving residual stresses.

Conclusion

Weld overlay repair of tundish chains is a well-established technology that offers significant economic and operational benefits when properly implemented. The key to successful repair lies in accurate failure diagnosis, appropriate material and process selection, meticulous execution of the repair procedure, and thorough quality verification. Engineers must approach each repair with a systematic methodology that considers the specific service conditions, failure history, and available resources to achieve optimal repair outcomes.