CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Research on Iron-Based High-Temperature Wear-Resistant Overlay Welding Electrodes

Literature Overview

The 1995 study by Liu Zhengjun, Ji Jie, and Hao Xuefeng from Shenyang University of Technology and the Shenyang Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspection Institute investigates the development of iron-based high-temperature wear-resistant overlay welding electrodes. This research addresses a significant industrial need for cost-effective alternatives to cobalt-based and nickel-based hardfacing alloys in high-temperature wear applications. The work represents an important contribution to the domestic development of overlay welding consumables in China during a period of rapid industrial growth.

Core Technical Content

Design Philosophy and Alloy Development

The research was driven by the need to develop iron-based overlay alloys that could achieve high-temperature wear resistance comparable to cobalt-based alloys (such as Stellite) at significantly lower cost. The design approach involved:

Electrode Composition Development

The study developed several electrode compositions, with the optimal composition characterized by:

Element Range (%) Function
C 2.5-4.0 Carbide former, matrix hardening
Cr 10-16 Carbide former, oxidation resistance
Mo 4-8 Solid solution strengthening, high-T stability
W 2-5 Carbide former, high-T strength
V 2-4 Fine carbide formation, wear resistance
Si 0.5-1.5 Deoxidizer, matrix modification
Mn 1.0-2.0 Sulfur scavenger, ductility
Fe Balance Base matrix

Microstructural Characteristics

The overlay deposits exhibited a microstructure consisting of:

Mechanical and Wear Properties

Property Electrode Composition A Electrode Composition B Stellite 6 (reference)
Hardness (HV, as-welded) 850-950 900-1000 450-550
Hardness (HV, 600°C) 800-900 850-950 420-520
Hardness (HV, 800°C) 700-800 750-850 400-480
Redundancy (N/mm²) 60-80 70-90 80-100
Wear resistance (relative) 3.5-4.5× 4.0-5.0× 2.5-3.5×
Impact toughness (J/cm²) 8-15 10-18 15-25

Process Analysis

Welding Process Parameters

The electrodes were designed for use with shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) process, which is the most commonly used process for overlay welding in field repair applications. The recommended parameters included:

Heat Treatment Considerations

The iron-based overlay deposits can be further optimized through post-weld heat treatment:

Engineering Practice and Application

Application Areas

The developed electrodes were targeted for applications in:

Comparison with Conventional Hardfacing

The iron-based electrodes offer several advantages over conventional hardfacing alloys:

However, limitations include:

Key Questions and Reflections

The study raises important questions about the cost-performance optimization of overlay welding consumables. While iron-based electrodes offer excellent wear resistance at lower cost, the trade-offs in toughness and thermal fatigue resistance must be carefully evaluated for each specific application. The choice between iron-based and cobalt-based alloys should be driven by a comprehensive analysis of the service conditions, including temperature range, wear mechanism, loading spectrum, and cost constraints.

Another reflection is the role of rare earth elements in modifying overlay microstructure. The experimental addition of lanthanum showed promise in refining carbide morphology and improving hot workability, but the long-term effects on service performance require further investigation.

Study Insights and Implications

This research represents an important contribution to the domestic development of overlay welding consumables. The developed iron-based electrodes provide a viable alternative to cobalt-based alloys for many high-temperature wear applications, offering a favorable cost-performance ratio. The work demonstrates that systematic alloy design, combined with careful process optimization, can achieve performance comparable to more expensive alloys. For engineers selecting overlay welding consumables, the key takeaway is that the choice should be application-driven, with a thorough understanding of the trade-offs between hardness, toughness, thermal stability, and cost.