CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Study Note on Numerical Simulation and Residual Stress Analysis of Heat Exchanger Tube Sheet Cladding

Literature Overview

This 2016 paper by researchers from Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, published in Modern Manufacturing Engineering, presents a numerical simulation study of the cladding process on heat exchanger tube sheets, with a focus on residual stress distribution and its implications for structural integrity. Heat exchanger tube sheets are critical components in pressure vessels and heat exchangers, and their cladding—typically with stainless steel or nickel-based alloys—is essential for corrosion resistance in aggressive process environments. The study leverages finite element analysis (FEA) to predict residual stress patterns that arise during multi-pass overlay welding, providing valuable insights for process optimization and defect prevention.

Core Technical Approach

The research employs a thermal-mechanical coupled finite element model to simulate the residual stress state in a tube sheet during cladding. The simulation accounts for:

The tube sheet geometry is modeled as a thick cylindrical plate with a central hole for tube insertion, and the cladding layer is deposited on the tube-side face, which is exposed to the process fluid.

Residual Stress Distribution Patterns

The simulation results reveal several characteristic residual stress patterns:

Stress Component Location Typical Magnitude Implications
Longitudinal Tensile Overlay center, far from weld start/end 200–400 MPa Risk of stress corrosion cracking in chloride environments
Circumferential Tensile Near the outer edge of the cladding 150–350 MPa Potential for edge cracking
Radial Compressive At the overlay-base metal interface -50 to -150 MPa Generally beneficial for fatigue life
Transverse Tensile Weld toe region 100–250 MPa Susceptible to fatigue crack initiation

The thermal expansion mismatch between austenitic stainless steel (approximately 17.3 × 10⁻⁶ /K) and carbon steel (approximately 12.0 × 10⁻⁶ /K) is a dominant factor. As the overlay cools, the austenitic layer contracts more than the ferritic substrate, generating tensile residual stresses in the overlay and compressive stresses in the base metal.

Process Optimization Strategies

Based on the simulation results, several process optimization strategies are proposed:

  1. Weld sequence design: Using a symmetric welding sequence from the center outward, or employing a spiral pattern, can reduce peak residual stresses compared to a single-direction linear sequence.
  2. Preheating: Applying a uniform preheat temperature of 100–150 °C reduces thermal gradients and lowers residual stress magnitudes.
  3. Interpass temperature control: Maintaining interpass temperatures below 150 °C prevents excessive softening of the base metal while still allowing some stress relaxation.
  4. Post-weld heat treatment (PWHT): Stress relief annealing at 620–650 °C for carbon steel tube sheets can reduce residual stresses by 50–80%, though this must be balanced against potential sensitization of the austenitic overlay.

Comparison of Cladding Processes for Tube Sheets

The study implicitly compares different cladding approaches:

Cladding Method Typical Residual Stress Level Dilution Control Suitability for Tube Sheets
SAW overlay High (300–500 MPa) Moderate Thick overlays (>3 mm)
GTAW overlay Moderate (200–350 MPa) Low Thin overlays, precise control
ESW overlay Moderate (250–400 MPa) Moderate Very thick overlays (>6 mm)
PTA cladding Low-Moderate (150–300 MPa) Very low Thin, high-quality overlays
Explosive cladding Low (<150 MPa) None Bonded layers, no weld dilution

Engineering Practice and Quality Control

In practical tube sheet cladding operations, the following quality control measures are essential:

Key Reflections and Study Insights

The numerical simulation approach presented in this paper is a powerful tool for predicting residual stress distributions without the need for extensive physical testing. However, several limitations should be acknowledged:

The study's most valuable contribution is the demonstration that weld sequence optimization can significantly reduce peak residual stresses, which directly impacts the risk of stress corrosion cracking in service. For engineers designing cladding procedures for heat exchanger tube sheets, this finding underscores the importance of not only selecting the appropriate welding process but also carefully planning the weld sequence to minimize residual stress accumulation.