CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Finite Element Analysis of Surface Residual Stress at Different Cladding Depths

Literature Overview

This paper, published in Metal Heat Treatment (2014) by Zhou Yuming and Shi Haifang from Liaoning Polytechnic College and Liaoning Technical University, presents a finite element analysis (FEA) of surface residual stresses at different depths in weld overlay cladding layers. Residual stress is a critical parameter that affects the fatigue life, stress corrosion cracking susceptibility, and dimensional stability of cladded components.

Core Technical Points

Thermal-Mechanical Coupled FEA Model

The finite element analysis of cladding residual stresses requires a coupled thermal-mechanical model that accounts for:

  1. Thermal analysis: Heat generation, conduction, convection, and radiation during the welding process.
  2. Phase transformation: The latent heat release/absorption during austenite-ferrite transformations.
  3. Plastic deformation: The development of plastic strain due to thermal expansion/contraction.
  4. Viscoelastic behavior: The time-dependent deformation at elevated temperatures.

The material properties must be temperature-dependent, including:

Residual Stress Distribution

The residual stress distribution in a multi-pass cladding layer exhibits a characteristic pattern that varies with depth from the surface:

Depth from Surface (mm) Longitudinal Stress (MPa) Transverse Stress (MPa)
0 (Surface) −150 to −250 (Compressive) −80 to −150 (Compressive)
0.5 −100 to −200 −50 to −120
1.0 −50 to −150 −20 to −80
1.5 0 to −100 0 to −50
2.0 (Substrate) 50 to 200 (Tensile) 30 to 150 (Tensile)

The compressive residual stresses at the surface are beneficial for fatigue life and stress corrosion cracking resistance, while the tensile stresses in the substrate can be detrimental. The transition from compressive to tensile stress typically occurs at a depth of 1–2 mm from the cladding surface.

Effect of Cladding Parameters on Residual Stress

Parameter Effect on Surface Compressive Stress
Increasing heat input Decreases compressive stress
Increasing pass thickness Increases compressive stress
Reverse welding sequence Increases compressive stress
Shot peening after welding Significantly increases compressive stress
Post-weld stress relief Reduces both compressive and tensile stresses

Numerical Model Validation

The FEA model must be validated against experimental measurements. Common experimental techniques include:

Method Depth Resolution Accuracy Cost
XRD 0–50 μm ±10 MPa Low
Neutron diffraction 0–50 mm ±20 MPa High
Hole drilling 0–5 mm ±15 MPa Medium
FEA prediction 0–100 mm ±30 MPa Low

Defect Analysis and Countermeasures

Residual Stress-Related Defects

  1. Distortion: Excessive residual stresses cause dimensional distortion that can exceed manufacturing tolerances.
  2. Cracking: High tensile residual stresses can initiate cracks, particularly in the HAZ or at the fusion boundary.
  3. Stress corrosion cracking: Tensile residual stresses in the presence of a corrosive environment can cause SCC, particularly in austenitic stainless steel cladding layers.
  4. Fatigue failure: Tensile residual stresses reduce the fatigue life by promoting crack initiation and propagation.

Engineering Countermeasures

Integration with Engineering Practice

In pressure vessel fabrication, the residual stress distribution in cladding layers must be considered in the design and qualification. The ASME Code allows for residual stress relaxation factors in the design calculations, but the actual stress distribution must be verified for critical applications.

For hydrogenation reactors and other high-pressure equipment, the residual stress state affects the susceptibility to hydrogen-induced cracking. Compressive residual stresses at the surface are beneficial, but the tensile stresses in the substrate can promote hydrogen embrittlement.

The FEA results must be incorporated into the inspection planning. Areas of high tensile residual stress are more susceptible to stress corrosion cracking and should be prioritized for non-destructive examination.

Key Reflections

The finite element analysis of cladding residual stresses provides valuable insights into the stress state of the component, but the accuracy of the predictions depends on the quality of the input data and the fidelity of the model. The temperature-dependent material properties, particularly the yield strength and thermal expansion coefficient, must be accurately characterized for the specific materials used.

The practical challenge is to balance the benefits of compressive residual stresses (improved fatigue life, reduced SCC susceptibility) with the risks of tensile residual stresses in the substrate (distortion, cracking). The welding procedure must be optimized to achieve the desired stress state while maintaining the required microstructure and mechanical properties.

From a quality assurance perspective, the residual stress measurements should be included in the inspection plan for critical cladding applications. The acceptance criteria for residual stresses should be defined based on the specific service conditions and the applicable code requirements.