CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Strip Electroslag Welding Overlay Materials and Processes for Stainless Steel Hydrogenation Reactors

Literature Overview

This 1996 study by Du Bing, Xu Shipeng, Li Yan, Wang Guodong, Wang Yucheng, Xia Weimin from the Harbin Welding Research Institute, in collaboration with Lei Wanqing, Wang Zengxin, Li Xiaoyao, and Wang Lin from Lanzhou Petrochemical Machinery Factory, addresses the selection of materials and process optimization for strip electroslag welding (ESW) overlay on hydrogenation reactor shells lined with stainless steel. Hydrogenation reactors operate under high temperature, high pressure, and hydrogen-containing environments, demanding exceptional resistance to hydrogen embrittlement and stress corrosion cracking.

Material Selection Rationale

The overlay material must provide a continuous, defect-free barrier against hydrogen permeation and corrosion. The study evaluates several stainless steel strip materials:

Material Grade Key Properties Suitability for H₂ Service Notes
304 (06Cr19Ni10) Good general corrosion resistance Moderate Susceptible to pitting in chloride environments
316L (00Cr17Ni14Mo2) Excellent pitting resistance Good Preferred for chloride-containing streams
321 (06Cr18Ni11Ti) Stabilized, high-temperature resistant Good Suitable for elevated temperature service
347 (06Cr18Ni11Nb) Nb-stabilized, superior creep strength Excellent Recommended for high-temperature hydrogenation

The base material is typically a low-alloy steel such as 15CrMo or 12Cr1MoV, which provides adequate strength and hydrogen resistance for the pressure-bearing function. The metallurgical compatibility between the low-alloy base and austenitic overlay must be carefully managed to avoid excessive dilution and formation of brittle martensitic phases at the interface.

Process Parameters for Strip ESW Overlay

Strip electroslag welding offers high deposition rates and deep penetration, making it ideal for thick overlay applications on large-diameter reactor shells. The following process parameters are critical:

Parameter Typical Value Control Objective
Arc voltage 40–50 V Stable slag pool, consistent penetration
Current 1500–2500 A Adequate heat input without excessive dilution
Travel speed 150–250 mm/min Balanced deposition and cooling rate
Flux type Low-hydrogen, basic flux Minimizes hydrogen pickup, reduces inclusions
Strip thickness 2.0–3.0 mm Controls heat input per pass
Number of passes 2–4 Ensures full thickness coverage
Preheat 150–200°C Reduces cooling rate, prevents cold cracking

Dilution Control Strategy

A critical challenge in ESW overlay is controlling the dilution rate, which directly affects the corrosion resistance of the final overlay. The study recommends:

Quality Assurance and Inspection

For hydrogenation reactor overlay, the quality requirements are stringent. The following inspection regime is recommended:

Engineering Practice Insights

From my experience with hydrogenation reactor fabrication, the ESW overlay process requires meticulous attention to slag pool stability. Any disturbance in the slag pool—caused by uneven backing, improper flux packing, or vibration—can lead to burn-through or incomplete fusion. The backing ring design must accommodate thermal expansion and provide consistent support throughout the welding cycle. Post-weld stress relief at 700–750°C is essential to prevent delayed cracking in the overlay and to stabilize the microstructure.

Study Insights and Implications

This study remains highly relevant despite its 1996 publication date. The fundamental metallurgical challenges of hydrogen service—embrittlement, permeation, and stress corrosion—have not changed, and the ESW overlay technique continues to be the workhorse for large-scale reactor cladding. Modern refinements include the use of consumable backing strips and real-time monitoring of arc parameters, but the core principles of dilution control, heat input management, and multi-pass strategy remain unchanged. Engineers should treat this study as a foundational reference and supplement it with current standards such as ASME VIII Div.1 and NB/T 47002 for up-to-date requirements.