CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Feasibility Study of Strip Electroslag Cladding for 2507 Super Duplex Stainless Steel

Literature Overview

This study note reviews the feasibility research conducted by Luo Yongjun, Wang Congyuan, Xu Shengdong, and Zhang Jianxiao, published in 2017 in the journal China Chemical Equipment. The study investigates the application of strip electroslag welding (ESW) cladding technology for depositing UNS S32750 (2507) super duplex stainless steel onto carbon steel substrates, targeting applications in oil and gas equipment where extreme corrosion resistance and high mechanical strength are simultaneously required.

Technical Background and Motivation

Super duplex stainless steel 2507 (UNS S32750) offers a unique combination of high yield strength (minimum 550 MPa), excellent pitting resistance (PREN > 40), and resistance to chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking. However, the high cost of solid 2507 plate limits its use to critical components only. Strip ESW cladding provides a cost-effective alternative by combining the economic strength of a carbon steel base with the corrosion resistance of a 2507 overlay layer, reducing material costs by 40–60% while maintaining equivalent corrosion performance.

Property 2507 Super Duplex SS A105 Carbon Steel Clad Assembly Target
Yield strength (MPa) ≥ 550 ≥ 180 Base: ≥ 180; Overlay: ≥ 500
Tensile strength (MPa) ≥ 795 ≥ 415 Overlay: ≥ 750
PREN > 40 < 5 Overlay: > 38
Pitting temperature (ASTM G48) > 50 °C < 10 °C Overlay: > 45 °C
Cost index 100 10 35–50

Electroslag Welding Cladding Process Parameters

Strip ESW cladding is a highly productive process that deposits thick overlay layers (typically 6–12 mm per pass) at rates 5–10 times higher than conventional arc welding processes. The process involves passing a strip electrode through a slag pool that acts as both a shielding medium and a heat source, providing deep, uniform penetration with minimal dilution.

Recommended ESW Cladding Parameters for 2507

Parameter Value Notes
Strip material UNS S32750 (2507) 4–6 mm thick, 50–100 mm wide
Base material A105 / SA-105 or P91 Pre-machined to flat surface
Current 3500–5000 A DC, strip as positive
Voltage 30–38 V Including slag voltage
Travel speed 150–350 mm/min Depends on strip thickness
Slag composition CaF₂ + CaO + SiO₂ + Al₂O₃ Basic flux, low sulfur
Preheat 100–150 °C To prevent cracking in base
Interpass temperature < 250 °C Critical for duplex phase balance
Post-weld heat treatment Solution treatment 1050–1100 °C / 1 h + water quench To restore phase balance
Target overlay thickness 6–12 mm Minimum 3% of base wall thickness

Metallurgical Challenges and Solutions

The primary metallurgical challenge in ESW cladding of 2507 is maintaining the duplex microstructure (approximately 40–60% ferrite / 40–60% austenite) throughout the overlay. Excessive heat input or high interpass temperatures can lead to austenite formation, loss of pitting resistance, and potential 475 °C embrittlement. Conversely, insufficient heat input can result in excessive ferrite and brittleness.

Phase Balance Control

Condition Ferrite % Consequence Solution
Normal ESW 45–55% Optimal properties Maintain interpass < 250 °C
High interpass 30–40% Reduced toughness, increased SCC risk Reduce interpass to < 200 °C
Low heat input 65–75% Brittle, reduced ductility Increase current or reduce travel speed
Post-weld solution treated 40–60% Restored phase balance Standard practice for 2507

Dilution Management

The dilution of base material into the overlay is the second critical challenge. In strip ESW cladding, dilution is typically 15–25% for the first pass and decreases to 5–10% for subsequent passes. High dilution introduces carbon and manganese from the carbon steel base, which can form sigma phase and reduce pitting resistance.

Pass Number Dilution (%) Ferrite Number (FN) Action Required
1st (bonding) 20–30% 15–20 Acceptable if followed by 2nd pass
2nd 5–15% 25–35 Monitor with FN probe
3rd 3–8% 32–38 Target range for final surface

Quality Control and Inspection Requirements

The cladding of 2507 super duplex stainless steel requires rigorous quality control to ensure both mechanical integrity and corrosion performance. The inspection regime should follow NB/T 47002 and ASME IX requirements, supplemented by duplex-specific tests.

Inspection Method Acceptance Criteria Standard Reference
Visual testing (VT) No cracks, undercut > 0.5 mm, or porosity NB/T 47013.1
Magnetic particle testing (MT) No linear indications > 3 mm NB/T 47013.4
Ultrasonic testing (UT) No lack of fusion, no cracks at interface NB/T 47013.2
Ferrite number (FN) 32–42 (Vickers FN) ISO 8044
Pitting resistance (ASTM G48) No pitting at 45 °C in 3.5% NaCl ASTM G48 Method B
Intergranular corrosion (ASTM A263) No intergranular attack ASTM A263 Practice E
Tensile test (overlay) UTS ≥ 750 MPa, elongation ≥ 20% ASME II Part A
Impact test (overlay) ≥ 47 J at -40 °C ASME II Part A

Engineering Practice and Feasibility Assessment

The feasibility study concluded that strip ESW cladding of 2507 super duplex stainless steel is technically viable and economically advantageous for large-diameter pressure vessels, heat exchanger shells, and pipe spools in the oil and gas industry. The productivity advantage of ESW over conventional arc processes is substantial: a 2000 mm × 2000 mm clad panel can be produced in approximately 4–6 hours compared to 20–30 hours for SAW or FCAW overlay.

However, the study also identified several practical limitations:

Summary and Study Insights

The feasibility study of strip ESW cladding for 2507 super duplex stainless steel demonstrates that this technology offers a compelling solution for large-scale corrosion-resistant cladding where productivity and cost-effectiveness are paramount. The key to successful implementation lies in rigorous control of interpass temperature, dilution management through multi-pass strategies, and mandatory post-weld solution heat treatment to restore the duplex phase balance. Engineers considering this technology should conduct thorough qualification testing on production-representative coupons and establish a comprehensive quality control plan that includes ferrite number monitoring, corrosion testing, and mechanical property verification. The technology is particularly well-suited for hydrogenation reactors, high-pressure separators, and chloride-containing process equipment in the petrochemical and oil and gas sectors.