CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Surface Overlay Welding of WK-35 Electric Shovel Bucket Teeth

Literature Overview

This 2016 publication in Open-pit Mining Technology, authored by Jin Haijun from Shenhua Beidian Shengli Energy Co., Ltd., addresses the surface overlay welding of bucket teeth on the WK-35 electric rope shovel, a massive piece of mining equipment used in open-pit coal mining operations. The WK-35 shovel, with its enormous bucket capacity and operating weight, represents a significant capital investment, and the maintenance and repair of its bucket teeth are critical to minimizing downtime and maximizing operational efficiency.

Core Technical Points

WK-35 Electric Shovel Overview

The WK-35 electric rope shovel is one of the largest mining shovels in operation, with the following approximate specifications:

Parameter Specification
Bucket capacity 35 m³
Operating weight ~500–600 tonnes
Bucket tooth dimensions Large (typically 1,000–2,000 mm long)
Operating environment Hard rock and overburden mining
Wear mechanism Abrasive wear from rock and soil
Service life of bucket teeth 100–500 hours (depending on material)

The bucket teeth are subjected to extreme abrasive wear from contact with hard rock, soil, and debris. The wear pattern is typically concentrated at the cutting edge and the sides of the tooth, where the material is subjected to the highest stress and abrasion.

Overlay Welding Process Selection

For bucket teeth of this size, the following overlay welding processes are considered:

Process Advantages Disadvantages Suitability for Bucket Teeth
SMAW Portable; simple equipment Low deposition rate; high operator skill required Suitable for field repair
SAW High deposition rate; good bead quality Requires flux handling; less flexible Suitable for workshop repair
FCAW High deposition rate; good bead shape Requires gas supply; moderate equipment Suitable for workshop repair
TIG Excellent bead quality; precise control Low deposition rate; high skill requirement Suitable for critical areas
Plasma arc High energy density; thick deposits Expensive equipment; specialized skill Suitable for large deposits

For WK-35 bucket teeth, FCAW or SAW is typically preferred for the combination of high deposition rate and good quality. SMAW may be used for field repair or for difficult-to-access areas.

Overlay Material Selection

The overlay material for mining bucket teeth must provide excellent abrasive wear resistance:

Material Type Hardness (HRC) Abrasive Wear Resistance Toughness Typical Application
High-carbon martensitic 55–65 Good Moderate General mining applications
High-alloy martensitic 60–70 Excellent Low Severe abrasive conditions
Austenitic 40–50 Good Excellent Impact + abrasion
Hardfacing cast iron 55–65 Excellent Low Severe abrasion; no impact
Nickel-based alloy 35–45 Moderate Excellent Extreme conditions; high cost

For WK-35 bucket teeth operating in hard rock mining conditions, high-alloy martensitic or hardfacing cast iron materials are typically preferred for their excellent abrasive wear resistance.

Welding Sequence and Technique

The welding sequence for bucket teeth is critical to ensure uniform coverage and minimize distortion:

  1. Surface preparation: Grind off worn surface; clean to bare metal; preheat to 200–300 °C
  2. Base layer: Apply a compatible base layer to ensure good bond with the base metal
  3. Build-up layers: Apply multiple layers of overlay material, alternating between sides to minimize distortion
  4. Profile layer: Apply the final layer to achieve the desired tooth profile
  5. Post-weld treatment: Stress relief annealing at 550–650 °C; final machining to restore tooth profile

Defect Analysis and Countermeasures

Defect Root Cause Impact Countermeasure
Cracking in overlay High carbon content; thermal stress Tooth failure during operation Control interpass temperature; use appropriate electrode; apply stress relief
Spalling of overlay Poor bond strength; high residual stress Loss of wear-resistant layer Ensure adequate first-pass penetration; apply post-weld stress relief
Excessive dilution High heat input; poor parameter control Reduced overlay hardness Reduce current; increase travel speed; use smaller electrode
Uneven coverage Inconsistent welding technique; distortion Uneven wear during operation Use symmetric welding sequence; apply backing plate; final machining
Porosity Flux contamination; base metal contamination Reduced overlay integrity Ensure proper flux handling; clean base metal thoroughly

Economic Analysis

The economic case for overlay welding repair of bucket teeth is compelling:

Cost Component Overlay Repair Tooth Replacement
Material cost ¥X (overlay wire) ¥Y (new tooth)
Labor cost ¥A (welding + machining) ¥B (removal + installation)
Downtime cost ¥C (short outage) ¥D (long outage)
Machine cost ¥E (grinding) ¥F (machining new tooth)
Total cost Significantly lower Significantly higher

The payback period for overlay welding is typically less than one shift, making it economically attractive even when accounting for the additional labor and machining requirements.

Study Reflections

The overlay welding repair of WK-35 bucket teeth represents a practical application of overlay welding technology in the mining industry, where equipment downtime is extremely costly and the availability of replacement parts may be limited. The key insights include:

The WK-35 shovel, with its massive size and high operating costs, represents a prime candidate for overlay welding repair. The ability to extend the service life of bucket teeth through overlay welding, rather than replacing them, is a significant cost-saving measure that directly impacts the operational efficiency of the mining operation. The study demonstrates the practical value of overlay welding technology in heavy equipment maintenance and repair, and provides a template for similar applications in other large mining equipment.