CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Online Emergency Handling of Cracking and Overlay Welding of Cemented Carbide Embedded Hammer Discs

Literature Overview

The paper by Zhang Bao, published in Cement Engineering in 2022, documents the emergency repair of a cracked cemented carbide embedded hammer disc used in cement grinding mills. The hammer disc is a critical component in ball mills and vertical roller mills, where it impacts and grinds cement clinker. The disc is constructed with a steel body and cemented carbide (WC-Co) segments embedded in the impact surface. The paper describes the diagnosis of cracking, the decision-making process for emergency repair, and the overlay welding technique used to restore the disc to serviceable condition.

Technical Background

Cemented carbide embedded hammer discs are subjected to severe impact loading, abrasion, and thermal cycling during cement grinding operations. The cemented carbide segments provide wear resistance, while the steel body provides toughness and structural integrity. Common failure modes include:

  1. Segment detachment: Due to fatigue cracking at the interface between the carbide and steel
  2. Steel body cracking: Due to impact fatigue or thermal stress
  3. Carbide segment chipping: Due to excessive impact force
  4. Weld cracking: If the disc has been previously repaired by welding

The paper focuses on a case where the steel body of the hammer disc developed cracks, threatening catastrophic failure during mill operation.

Damage Assessment

Visual Inspection

The initial inspection revealed:

Non-Destructive Testing

The damaged disc was inspected using:

The inspection results showed:

Inspection Method Finding Severity
MT 3 surface cracks, total length 45 mm Moderate
UT Crack depth 15-25 mm Moderate
RT No internal voids or inclusions Acceptable

Material Analysis

The steel body was identified as medium carbon steel (e.g., 45 steel or 40Cr) with a hardness of 250-300 HB. The cemented carbide segments were WC-Co with 6-8% cobalt binder, with a hardness of 1400-1500 HV.

Emergency Repair Decision

Criteria for Repair vs. Replacement

The decision to repair rather than replace the hammer disc was based on the following considerations:

Factor Assessment Decision Impact
Crack depth < 30% of disc thickness Repair feasible
Number of cracks 3 cracks, localized Repair feasible
Disc thickness 80 mm Sufficient material for repair
Production urgency Mill shutdown costly Repair preferred
Replacement lead time 4-6 weeks Repair preferred
Repair cost vs. replacement Repair 20% of replacement cost Repair preferred

Repair Procedure

The emergency repair procedure involved the following steps:

  1. Crack arrest: Drilling a small hole (6 mm diameter) at the crack tip to arrest further propagation
  2. Crack removal: Grinding out the crack to a U-shaped groove with a minimum depth of 30 mm and width of 15 mm
  3. Surface preparation: Cleaning the groove surfaces to bare metal using a flap wheel
  4. Preheating: Heating the disc to 200-250°C using oxy-fuel torch or induction heating
  5. Overlay welding: Depositing weld metal in multiple passes using low-hydrogen electrodes
  6. Post-weld heat treatment: Stress relief at 550-600°C for 2 hours
  7. Surface finishing: Grinding the repaired area to restore the original surface profile

Welding Parameters

The overlay welding was performed using manual metal arc welding (SMAW) with the following parameters:

Parameter Value Notes
Electrode type E7018 or E8018 Low-hydrogen, high-toughness
Electrode diameter 4.0 mm For fill passes
Welding current 140 - 180 A DCEN polarity
Arc voltage 22 - 28 V
Travel speed 40 - 60 mm/min Manual control
Preheat temperature 200 - 250°C To prevent cold cracking
Interpass temperature < 250°C
Number of passes 4 - 5 Build up to original profile
Post-weld heat treatment 550 - 600°C, 2 hours Stress relief

Interface Considerations

The repair must address the interface between the steel body and the cemented carbide segments. The following considerations are critical:

The repair procedure therefore involves:

Quality Verification

After repair, the hammer disc was inspected using:

Engineering Insights

Lessons Learned

The emergency repair of the hammer disc provided several valuable lessons:

  1. Preventive maintenance is critical: Regular inspection of hammer discs can detect cracks before they become critical. A scheduled inspection program should include visual inspection, MT, and UT at intervals of 3-6 months depending on operating conditions.
  2. Material selection matters: The choice of steel for the hammer body should consider weldability. Low-carbon steels or low-alloy steels with low carbon equivalent (< 0.40%) are more weldable and less prone to cold cracking.
  3. Welding procedure qualification is essential: The welding procedure used for emergency repair should be qualified in accordance with applicable codes (e.g., ASME IX, AWS D1.1, or GB/T 19866). This ensures that the repair weld meets the required mechanical properties.
  4. Post-repair monitoring is important: After emergency repair, the hammer disc should be monitored closely during the first 100-200 hours of operation. Any signs of new cracking or abnormal vibration should trigger immediate shutdown and inspection.

FMEA Analysis

A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for hammer disc cracking can be summarized as follows:

Failure Mode Cause Effect Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Countermeasure
Steel body cracking Impact fatigue, thermal stress Disc failure, mill shutdown 10 6 4 240 Regular inspection, material upgrade
Carbide segment detachment Interface fatigue, thermal mismatch Loss of grinding efficiency 8 5 3 120 Proper welding procedure, quality control
Weld cracking after repair Hydrogen, residual stress Repair failure 10 4 5 200 Low-hydrogen electrodes, PWHT
Excessive wear Hardness mismatch, improper operation Premature disc replacement 6 7 3 126 Hardness matching, operational monitoring

Summary

The emergency repair of a cracked cemented carbide embedded hammer disc demonstrates that overlay welding can be effectively used to restore damaged components to serviceable condition, provided that careful assessment, proper procedure development, and thorough quality control are implemented. The key to success lies in understanding the metallurgical challenges at the steel-carbide interface, controlling heat input to prevent thermal damage to the carbide segments, and ensuring adequate post-weld heat treatment to relieve residual stresses. This experience underscores the importance of preventive maintenance and regular inspection to avoid emergency repairs that may compromise long-term reliability.