CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Wear Resistance and Wear Mechanism of Zinc-Based Alloy Weld Overlay Layers

Literature Overview

This research by Tu Yimin, Yu Hua, Duan Shixin, and Zhou Yan from Henan University of Science and Technology and CITIC Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (2005) investigates the tribological performance and wear mechanisms of zinc-based alloy weld overlay coatings applied to mining machinery components. The study addresses a critical materials selection challenge: balancing corrosion resistance (provided by zinc) with wear resistance (required for mining applications) in a single overlay layer.

Background and Motivation

Zinc-based alloys, including zinc-aluminum alloys and zinc-magnesium alloys, are widely used for corrosion protection in marine and atmospheric environments due to their sacrificial anodic properties. However, zinc's inherently low hardness (approximately 50–80 HV for pure zinc) renders it unsuitable for abrasive wear environments without modification. Mining machinery components frequently operate in dual-service conditions — exposed to corrosive moisture while subjected to abrasive particle impact — creating a demand for overlay materials that combine both properties.

Zinc-Based Alloy Compositions Studied

Alloy Designation Composition (wt%) Typical Hardness (HV) Application
Zn-25Al Zn-25Al-1Cu-0.5Mg 80–110 Corrosion + light wear
Zn-10Al-2Ni Zn-10Al-2Ni-0.5Mg 120–150 Moderate wear + corrosion
Zn-5Al-3Mn Zn-5Al-3Mn-0.3Mg 100–130 Abrasive wear
Zn-3Al-1Cu Zn-3Al-1Cu-0.5Mg 70–95 General corrosion protection
Zn-15Al-3Si Zn-15Al-3Si-0.5Mg 110–140 Slurry wear

Wear Mechanism Analysis

Primary Wear Mechanisms Identified

  1. Abrasive wear (dominant): Hard particles in the mining environment (quartz, feldspar, hematite) embed into the softer zinc matrix and plough through the surface, creating grooves and material removal. The wear rate is governed by the Archard equation modified for composite materials, where the relative hardness ratio between the abrasive particle and the overlay determines the wear mechanism transition from micro-ploughing to micro-cutting.
  2. Adhesive wear (secondary): Under high contact pressure, zinc's ductility promotes material transfer to the counterface. This mechanism becomes significant when the overlay encounters steel counterfaces under heavy loading conditions.
  3. Fatigue wear (tertiary): Cyclic loading causes micro-crack initiation at the overlay-bond line or within the overlay layer, leading to spalling. The fatigue life is particularly sensitive to the quality of the metallurgical bond between the zinc-based overlay and the steel substrate.

Microstructural Contributions to Wear Performance

The wear resistance of zinc-based overlays is governed by several microstructural features:

Process Parameters Affecting Wear Performance

Parameter Low Value Optimal Range High Value Effect on Wear
Preheat temperature < 100°C 150–250°C > 350°C Low: poor bond; High: excessive dilution
Current density < 150 A/mm² 180–250 A/mm² > 300 A/mm² Low: incomplete fusion; High: dilution > 20%
Travel speed < 50 mm/min 80–150 mm/min > 200 mm/min Low: wide bead; High: poor penetration
Interpass temperature < 80°C 100–180°C > 250°C Low: cracking risk; High: coarse grain
Wire diameter 1.0 mm 1.2–1.6 mm 2.4 mm Affects bead geometry and dilution

Dilution Control and Its Impact

Dilution is the most critical process variable for zinc-based overlays because zinc's low melting point (420°C) compared to steel (1500°C) creates a significant challenge. Excessive dilution (> 25%) introduces iron into the overlay, reducing the corrosion protection effectiveness while potentially increasing hardness. The target dilution for optimal performance is typically 10–20%, which can be achieved through:

Engineering Practice and Case Studies

In mining applications, zinc-based overlays have been successfully applied to:

Defect Analysis and Quality Control

Defect Detection Method Root Cause Prevention
Bond line cracking MT / UT Thermal stress from rapid cooling Increase preheat; reduce current
Zinc vaporization porosity RT / UT Zinc boiling point (907°C) below weld pool temperature Use low-current process; shield with flux
Excessive dilution Hardness profile / SEM High heat input Reduce current; increase travel speed
Surface spalling Visual / UT Poor metallurgical bond Improve surface preparation; use transition layer
Delamination UT (tapping) Incomplete fusion at bond line Verify wetting; increase current locally

Study Insights and Implications

The research by Tu Yimin and colleagues established that zinc-based alloy overlays can achieve acceptable wear performance in mining applications when the alloy composition is properly designed to maximize the volume fraction of hard intermetallic phases. The key insight is that wear resistance in zinc-based systems is not achieved by increasing the hardness of the zinc matrix itself (which is thermodynamically limited) but by engineering a composite microstructure with dispersed hard phases.

The practical implication for engineers is that zinc-based overlays should not be considered as direct substitutes for conventional hardfacing alloys in severe abrasive wear applications. Rather, they serve a niche role where corrosion protection is the primary requirement and wear conditions are moderate. For severe abrasive wear, traditional Fe-Cr-C or Co-Cr hardfacing alloys remain the preferred choice, while zinc-based overlays are best deployed in dual-service environments where corrosion protection is equally or more important than wear resistance.

The wear mechanism analysis conducted in this study provides a framework for predicting overlay performance in specific mining environments. By characterizing the dominant wear mechanism (abrasive, adhesive, or fatigue) for a given application, engineers can select the appropriate zinc alloy composition and process parameters to optimize service life.