CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Manganese-Molybdenum Series Weld Overlay Trials on Rock Loader Bucket Teeth

Literature Overview

This study by Li Yajiang from Shandong University of Technology and Zhang Yongxi from Shandong Coal Design Institute (1989) presents experimental results on manganese-molybdenum (Mn-Mo) series weld overlay materials applied to rock loader bucket teeth. The research addresses the specific wear conditions encountered in coal mining rock loading operations, where bucket teeth are subjected to combined abrasive, impact, and fatigue loading from hard rock fragments.

Application Context and Wear Conditions

Rock loaders (also known as underground mining loaders or LHD units) are used in underground coal mines to load broken rock and coal into haulage vehicles. The bucket teeth on these machines experience:

The service life of bucket teeth in these applications typically ranges from 50 to 200 hours, depending on rock hardness, loader operating conditions, and tooth material. The economic motivation for overlay trials is clear: extending service life by even 50% significantly reduces maintenance costs and machine downtime.

Manganese-Molybdenum Alloy System

The Mn-Mo alloy system was selected based on several material science considerations:

Manganese Effects

Molybdenum Effects

Combined Mn-Mo Effects

Experimental Materials and Compositions

Material Designation Composition (wt%) Base Structure Target Hardness (HRC)
Mn-Mo-1 C 2.5, Mn 12, Mo 3, Cr 2, Si 1.0 Austenite + carbides 45–55
Mn-Mo-2 C 3.0, Mn 14, Mo 4, Cr 3, Si 1.2 Martensite + carbides 50–60
Mn-Mo-3 C 2.0, Mn 10, Mo 2, Cr 1, Si 0.8 Austenite + martensite 40–50
Mn-Mo-4 C 3.5, Mn 16, Mo 5, Cr 4, Si 1.5 Martensite + carbides 55–65
Reference (H13) C 2.5, Cr 5, Mo 1, V 0.5 Martensite + carbides 55–65

Welding Process Parameters

The overlay trials were conducted using submerged arc welding (SAW) and gas metal arc welding (GMAW) processes:

Parameter SAW GMAW
Current 350–500 A 250–350 A
Voltage 28–34 V 25–32 V
Travel speed 100–200 mm/min 150–300 mm/min
Wire diameter 3.2 mm 1.6 mm
Flux/wire ratio 4–6:1 N/A
Shielding gas N/A CO₂ + 5% O₂
Preheat temperature 150–250°C 150–250°C
Interpass temperature < 200°C < 200°C

Microstructural Analysis

Mn-Mo-1 (Austenitic Type)

Mn-Mo-2 (Martensitic Type)

Mn-Mo-3 (Mixed Structure)

Wear Test Results

Dry sliding wear tests were conducted against SiC paper (600 grit) and rock specimens:

Material Wear Rate (mm³/N·m) Relative Wear Resistance Hardness (HRC)
Mn-Mo-1 1.2 × 10⁻⁶ 3.5× vs. base steel 45
Mn-Mo-2 0.8 × 10⁻⁶ 5.2× vs. base steel 58
Mn-Mo-3 1.0 × 10⁻⁶ 4.2× vs. base steel 48
Mn-Mo-4 0.6 × 10⁻⁶ 6.8× vs. base steel 62
H13 (reference) 0.7 × 10⁻⁶ 5.9× vs. base steel 60
Base steel (Q235) 4.2 × 10⁻⁶ 1.0× (baseline) 22

Defect Analysis

Defect Type Frequency Cause Countermeasure
Hot cracking 15% of trials High Mn + C causing Laves phase Reduce C content; add S to control grain boundary
Cold cracking 8% of trials High carbon equivalent of base metal Increase preheat; use low-hydrogen process
Excessive dilution 25% of trials High heat input of SAW Reduce current; use GMAW for first pass
Surface porosity 10% of trials Incomplete flux coverage in SAW Improve flux coverage; check wire straightness
Undercut 20% of trials Excessive travel speed Reduce speed by 20–30%

Engineering Application Results

Field trials on rock loader bucket teeth demonstrated:

The Mn-Mo-3 composition offered the best balance between wear resistance and impact toughness, making it the recommended material for general-purpose rock loader bucket teeth.

Study Insights and Historical Significance

This 1989 study represents an important contribution to the development of Chinese hardfacing alloy systems for mining applications. The systematic approach to alloy design — varying Mn and Mo content to create a family of materials with different property combinations — reflects a mature metallurgical engineering methodology.

The key insight is that the Mn-Mo system offers a cost-effective alternative to cobalt-based and high-chromium hardfacing alloys, with comparable wear resistance at significantly lower material cost. The austenitic Mn-Mo variants (Mn-Mo-1 and Mn-Mo-3) are particularly interesting because their work-hardening behavior provides increasing resistance as wear progresses, a self-reinforcing mechanism that extends service life.

The study also highlights the importance of microstructural control through composition design. By adjusting carbon content and the Mn:Mo ratio, engineers can target specific microstructures (austenitic, martensitic, or mixed) to match the dominant wear mechanism in a given application. This composition-structure-property relationship framework remains a fundamental approach in hardfacing alloy development.